But first, for those of
you who are not familiar with exactly what a burqa is, let me enlighten you. Muslims believe in hijab, which means "to veil or cover." Much like Mormons, they believe that both women and men should be modest in dress. The burqa is an outer garment worn by very conservative Muslim women with the purpose of covering one's entire bodies. You will see burqas with actual eye holes or sometimes a mesh screen (like the one on the left). This is not to be confused with the simple *veil (head scarf) that many Muslim women wear (covering only their hair), or the chador, which loosely covers the entire body, but leav
es the face open to the breeze.So back to the BBC. The point of the article was that a Moroccan Muslim woman in France was denied French citizenship because she wears the burqa. Because, as the woman in question was bluntly told "her practice of 'radical' Islam was not compatible with French values." The minister, a Muslim woman herself, said that the burqa "is a prison, it's a straightjacket."
I myself find the burqa to be, in many cases, a symbol of the oppression of Muslim women. For many of them, especially women in Iran, the burqa (or chador, for that matter) has been forced on them by fundamentalist regimes. They have no choice but to wear the burqa, regardless of their personal religious views.
BUT!
For many other women, especially the more conservative Muslim women, the burqa is a symbol of their modesty and chastity. It is t
heir way of being obedient to what they perceive to be God's law. Whether of not I agree with their point of view is irrelevant; I believe that we should respect their right to practice their religion as they see fit.So when I read that a woman in France was being denied citizenship for her religious practices, I couldn't help but be outraged. Yes, I know, it's France (maybe they never had freedom of religion). But still! This was done with complete and utter disrespect for a long-valued tradition based on a deeply rooted fear of Islam and anything associated fundamentalism. And it makes me very angry.
Although I don't think it will ever reach this point in the US, I am often astounded by the number of people I meet/ read comments from/ talk to/ etc., with views that echo Madam Minister and company's opinions. So for all of you out there who applaud France's discriminatory decision, here's something to consider:
Wearing a burqa does NOT equal fundamentalist.
Veiling does NOT equal oppressed.
Being Muslim does NOT equal terrorist.
*An interesting side note about veiling: many scholars believe that head covering did not begin with Islam, but was introduced into Arabia (where Mohammed eventually adopted the practice, to some extent) by people from Syria and Iran. It is believed that veiling was a sign of social status because a woman who was veiled could obviously not work in the fields...kind of like Chinese women whose feet were bound.





