According to the article, Cabrera's community is 98.7% Hispanic, and 87% of them speak a language other than English at home (ie Spanish). Cabrera is a US citizen who graduated from a bilingual high school. She rates her own English skills as a 5 out of 10. Most of (dare I assume all) the other city council members are bilingual. Meetings are conducted in English, but with a Spanish-speaking community, and much of her interaction would be in Spanish. As with most foreign language speakers, her comprehension is higher than her productive abilities, but in a court evaluation, she struggled to answer questions put before her by the court.
Arizona does have an English-only law, and in 1910 Arizona became a state under the stipulation that "The ability to read, write, speak, and understand the English language sufficiently well to conduct duties of the office without aid of an interpreter shall be a necessary qualification for all state officers and members of the state legislature." Now if Cabrera's English is so poor that she requires a translator, I would agree wholeheartedly with the judge. Cabrera, however, believes she can function efficiently as is, and even studies with a tutor to improve her English. The law does not specify a particular level of English one must speak as long as one can understand sufficiently well.
I'm reminded of a particular southern state representative who, when giving a testimony at a congressional hearing (or some similar type of event...I can't quite remember) was nearly incomprehensible to a speaker of Standard American English. But her constituents understood her well enough to vote her into office, so who am I to complain that I didn't understand her dialect? I think the same principal applies here. Cabrera is an ideal representative of the people of her community; they want someone who speaks like they speak and knows what it's like to grow up bilingual.
I tend to agree with them. I think this issue goes beyond the English-only debate; Cabrera is not arguing that Spanish should be used on the city council, but that her English, imperfect thought it may be, is good enough. And in a country full of languages, dialects, and accents, I think that's all we should ask for. Thoughts?
2 comments:
I have two ideas about this:
First, in this case it seems to me like it is important that she speak both English and Spanish. It's pretty clear that her constituents need a Spanish speaker so that they can voice their concerns/support/etc, but that is only half of being a government representative. The other half is taking those concerns and communicating them to the city council, mayor, etc. While she says she should be fine because she won't be dealing with the White House, I think it's important to remember that she will be dealing with other council members, the local mayor, county officials, and maybe even some state officials. In order for her constituents to receive the best representation, I think she needs to be able to listen to them in Spanish or English or whatever they want, but she must also be able to pass on those concerns and be an effective voice for her people.
Second, like it or not, I think people who don't speak Standard American English (or at least something close to it) are at a disadvantage in the professional world. I attended a DC Council meeting last week where local citizens were presenting their concerns to a councilwoman and other council members. The first two citizens gave their concerns in Standard American English and the third person addressed the council with heavy traces of African American Vernacular English in her speech. When the council member responded to each person, she treated the first two as intellectual and conversational equals, but when she spoke to the third person, she sub-consciously spoke down to her. She simplified her sentence structure and word choice and changed her tone. The lady may have been highly educated and very smart, but the councilwoman treated her differently because of how she spoke. This may not be right, or a deal breaker when considering if English proficiency is necessary, but I think it is a reality worth considering.
Lo siento que escribí tanto.
I haven't commented on your posts recently. So...
1. I hope gets a good job so that you can quit. But if not, life goes on. I am teaching ESL because it pays the bills, and I don't have a niche with ASU's linguistics program.
2. I think Romney is ok. I like him much better than Gingrich. So... I don't think it is "his" fault he pays less in taxes. However, I am SOO for a flat tax. Everyone should pay 15%.
3. I think Arizona is full of crap. She should have the right to run. If she isn't able to do well, then her constituency will learn that they need someone with better English. so there!
I miss you! I want to sit around for like hours and hours and chat about these things while sipping something warm and delicious and eating ANYTHING that you cooked! I might have to settle for a phone conversation though and eat something that I cook myself... :)
Post a Comment